Go To Vogue.co.uk And Type (on Your Keyboard) up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A And

Sora: donald help i'm dying

Donald:

Sora:

Donald:

Sora:

Donald: *heals goofy*

remember when paul, sebastian, anthony and chris were on jimmy kimmel and jimmy was like “wait, what do u mean there was a lot of lube?” and seb goes “well i mean i gotta get in there…right.” and then the four of them just

and summed themselves up perfectly? seb’s just instant regret, chris is like “seb that’s gonna be on the internet forever”, mackie’s like ayyyy that’s my boy right there, and paul is questioning how he ended up with these people 

i want…………………………a normie gf

https://vine.co/v/ebqxAu5bIWd/embed/simple

but the real question is

am i someone’s senpai

Hey, let’s talk about debate a little bit.

I was a high school and college debater.  Lincoln-Douglas, parli, humorous interpretation, extemp.  I was on one of the top teams in the country.  (I was not one of the top debaters personally, I was just okay, but just-okay at a high level.  If you get me.)  I’ve got trophies in being an “um, actually” dude.

And this is why I don’t believe in the power of debate for settling serious issues.  Because teams alternate positions over the course of a tournament, but teams with better preparation and training tend to win no matter which position they take.  The whole sport wouldn’t work if the morally right side of an issue was always the one with the strongest arguments.

(In fact, being personally invested in the rightness of your argument is sometimes a detriment, because you can get flustered and emotional while the other guy is projecting nothing but calm confidence.)

I learned to speak passionately about why the US needs to retain nuclear supremacy for world peace, and also to speak passionately about why the US needs to lead the world in nuclear disarmament.  I can’t say “I can convince you of both,” because your own preconceptions are such a huge factor, but if you agree to be an impartial judge, I can absolutely convince you of both.  The “but in the end the truth wins out” factor is so much smaller than you’d like to think.

 This isn’t to say you shouldn’t ever engage in debate.  If you think you can win, go in and kick some ass.  It’s a valid way to present and defend your beliefs.  But don’t trust debate as a truth-finding process.  Don’t leave human welfare up to “whoever wins the debate.”  Don’t get sucked into believing debate is somehow a morally superior tactic to deplatforming or protest.  There’s so much style and technique involved in debate, it’s little better than saying “we’ll agree the truth is on the side of whoever wins this arm-wrestling match.”

Impartially moderated debate is a great college sport for people who don’t work out.  But there’s absolutely nothing sacred about it as a political process.

what

at my school u can pay $5 to have someone play careless whispers to someone on a saxophone