A Century Later, He Still Remembers His Face

I feel like the term "grooming" has lost its meaning because of antis who overuse it.

antis when proshippers show basic respect: they’re clearly grooming you!!

glasses so handsome

"You're putting your sick fantasies onto fictional characters!!"

Oh!! Oh no! I was putting FANTASIES... onto FICTIONAL characters!?! Why did no one tell me!?

The four horseman of please shut the fuck up

"they're an adult they should know that drawing/writing about these things is bad!" or maybe they know that what they like is taboo but they don't give a fuck about what other people think

so yeah about the new update

also sugar literally calls her "my other half" is this something???

Why do "irl kiddos" aka kids seeking to be groomed use the shota and shotacon tags

SHOTA IS A FICTIONAL TERM, ABOUT FICTIONAL TROPES

(I'm not gonna block tags like "irl kiddo" or alike tho cuz any time I see one of those posts I report it, I know they will probs just make a new one but at least it slows or slightly prevents them getting groomed, and I also know it just upsets me to see those posts, but knowing I'm helping even the slightest to keep kids away from harm makes that worth it)

☹︎ DNI: Radqueers, transX, IRL kiddos OR supporters of any of these ☹︎

REPEAT AFTER ME:

GAY CODED IS A THING BECAUSE GAY PEOPLE ARE STILL STIGMATIZED

SIBLING CODED IS NOT A THING BECAUSE BEING SIBLINGS IS NOT STIGMATIZED.

YOU DON'T HAVE TO SNEAK BEING SIBLINGS PAST THE CENSOR

IN FACT, A LOT OF GAY CODED CHARACTERS GET TURNED INTO SIBLINGS OR COUSINS JUST TO GET THEM BY THE CENSOR SO THEY CAN SHOW THEM BEING AFFECTIONATE WITHOUT CUTTING IT OUT

THINK SOMETIMES AND REMEMBER THAT CANON DOESN'T MATTER IN FAN WORK BECAUSE FAN WORK DOESN'T CHANGE CANON

cw vent

I find it so so disrespectful how as soon as someone makes sexy fanarts of a fictional character who's a sa victim, antis come to harass them like "sexualizing sa victims is disgusting and wrong and we're right to harass you for it" and even go as far as to edit their art to completely cover the character in clothes until we can't see an inch of skin.

I'm not going to sugarcoat it: as a sex-positive rape survivor, go fuck yourself antis who insinuate that ALL victims must absolutely become sex-negative and aren't allowed to be sexy anymore to be a "valid victim"

"Valid victimhood" is the stupidest thing to come out of all this discourse. All victims are valid. It doesn't matter if they're sex negative or sex positive. It doesn't matter how they present themselves. It doesn't matter what they believe in. There's no such thing as an invalid victim.