"A cynic is a man who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing." - Oscar Wilde
But I read this fantastic article that pretty much said the opposite, so I'm torn between a 19th century gay romantic or a Scottish philosopher.
I don't know if anyone else thought this but I've just finished watching Season 1 of Stranger Things for the first time (I know I'm late to it but please no spoilers!!!) and did anyone else think that Will was going to get pregnant with slug things like that dude in Round the Twist did that one episode?
This cannot be a coincidence. In nine months Will is going to be the proud mother to an inter dimensional slug baby.
And on another note Round the Twist was...something. I remember loving it as a kid so I went back and watched a bunch of episodes on youtube and oh man. It's a lot.
dogs are the best guys i mean no one else in my life is that excited to see me when i come home.
actually no one in my life is that excited at all.
My parents r now so invested in the quest to get Taylor Swift eras tickets that if we don’t end up succeeding my house will be looking very Shakespearean. Tragic stylez
One thing I think about all the time is the sheer scale of propaganda out in the world right now.
Consider for a moment, Henry IV of Castille. He was the brother of Isabella of Castille, who became Queen after his death, and it was because of her that Christopher Columbus set out on his voyage for India. We know SO MUCH about Isabella and Ferdinand and the conquest of the Americas but we know so little about Henry IV. And yes, that's in part because he didn't do as much and wasn't as significant, but it's also because during his rule, his position as monarch was tenuous. He had a lot of detractors and people vying for his throne. These detractors put out huge amounts of propaganda, about him and his daughter, and because there's so much nonsense to wade through to pick out even a sliver of truth, we know barely anything about his reign.
If Historians can be largely clueless as to what happened 500 years ago, in a time where there was no social media or internet, and there were highly limited mediums through which to spread propaganda and misinformation, how screwed does that make us now?
Surely it'll be hundreds of times more difficult to ascertain what happened when there are thousands of contradicting tweets, videos and articles surrounding every issue. It's unspeakably horrible to imagine that 600 years from now, Historians might look back and believe the words of Anti-Vaxxers, or take everything Trump and his supporters say as gospel. I'm not saying they will, because Historians are super smart, and a big part of the discipline is taking sources with a grain of salt, but I think it's a legitimate concern, that we're going to lose the lessons we could've learnt from our present, because it's so bogged down in bullshit.
Please welcome your new favourite ship dynamic:
Deranged x Also deranged but hiding it better
The other day I met a guy and his opening line was "So, what do you think of Andrew Tate?" and without pausing to even let me speak, he ploughed on forward with "Because I reckon I agree with him about 20%."
My response was "Just to warn you, you sound like a little like a douche." And he gets REAL mad.
The feeling when you lose an argument because you were so shocked you couldn't sound coherent and you spend the next 10 years thinking about that. This was not that.
"Hitler supported free health care and in the 40s was going around telling everyone to stop smoking. Do you support Hitler 20%?"
Oh my lord.
This is late but Happy Ides of March everyone!
Christmas is fun because life is normal but now I have the added stress of buying presents I’m not sure people will like and all of a sudden I no longer like Mariah Carey.
since the old version of this post was flagged for 'adult content'...
She/her. Books, Memes & Movies, sometimes all at once.
28 posts