My Workout For Sunday February 02

Struggles with writing

I must admit something to everyone --- I have been attempting to write a screenplay for quite some time now.

The idea came to me while I was recollecting my film reviews and thinking about how most film critics haven't had a produced screenplay or actively participated in the filmmaking process (the notable exception to this is Roger Ebert and his script for Beyond the Valley of the Dolls. My educational background is in engineering, but one of my passions since high school was watching movies and films and becoming an amateur critic and cinephile. I love seeing the disparate genres and techniques, the history of American and international cinema informing and influencing specific artists and works, and evolving my idea of what makes a film or movie "good" or "bad."

However, I believed that my critiques would be limited in quality and understanding if I didn't at least attempt to participate in some part of the filmmaking process. In the film adaptation of High Fidelity, Rob Gordon, purveyor of "high pop culture," decides to try his hand at the music business by helping some local skater punks put out a record they recorded and he liked. As Laura, his girlfriend, highlights, he is now a part of the culture that he and his friends have observed and critiqued from a bird's eye view. With High Fidelity being one of my favorite films and with wanting to hone my critical eye, I was partly inspired by that plot development to participate in the filmmaking process by writing a draft script.

However, there have been several issues that have popped up throughout the process. The first and most important issue is that I haven't written fiction since junior high for assignments. I haven't lost my sense of imagination --- I've had several ideas for stories appear in my thoughts, and I can come up with a couple of big scenes that I feel would make a major impact. The problem is that I can't fill in the blanks when it comes to those thoughts. Since the beginning of college, I have been a glorified essayist as an amateur critic. Nonfiction has been my writing field. Writing critiques and essays come more naturally to me because the audience is me. The thoughts are mine. Everything said is what I want to say.

This informs of my second major issue --- Who is my audience?

Writing critiques and essays does require understanding of who the author wants to read his/her work, but the tailoring process, at least to me, is easier with these works because the end result is still clearly in the author's control. Compromises are made in the flow and diction, but the thoughts are pure.

When I write critiques or essays, my idea of the audience is people who want to read the "hows" and "whys" or for people who want to learn to read the "hows" and "whys." My critiques are never "cut-to-the-chase" works. I want to lay out what I thought was good and bad and then show why the structure is strengthened or weakened due to those proficiencies and deficiencies. Ideally, I want the "cut-to-the-chase" readers to read my critiques and become more inquisitive about the idea of "good" and "bad." Understandably, this is a flawed hope due to my writing approach being static and wanting more people to become elastic when it usually takes the approach to become more elastic to get the static readers. I still hold to my ideals, though, and it is why I see writing critiques and essays as a less compromising form.

My attempt at writing fiction stalls because my definition of the audience has now increased in size. I don't want to write a script that only caters to me (i.e. Michael Scott from The Office and his script for Threat Level Midnight). I want to write something that will keep someone's interest yet be authentic with the characters and their motivations. It's easy to write characters with my voice and thoughts, but I obviously can't make every character that way. It worked for Kevin Smith for a decade, but then it stopped working for Kevin Smith (one can only write so many permutations of Clerks before the idea loses traction). Once I think about the audience, I start to lose grasp of the idea, gaps begin to enlarge, and it all iterates until I have hit the point of overthinking.

My final major issue, and one that is specific to screenwriting, is this --- how the hell do I write something that is interesting for at least 90 minutes?

This issue is due to how the logical part of my mind works. I look at my ideas and develop a very basic plot. While looking at the plot, I fill in the blanks and realize that the plot could be completed in 15 to 30 minutes (if one thinks this is how writing for a television show works, that's only part of the battle --- a American season is at least 13 episodes, and coming up with a good story arc for several episodes is no easy task, so good luck coming up with the other 12+ episodes). Then I start thinking of subplots, but they start to appear arbitrary to the general plot, and the whole structure collapses in my head. The unwritten rule for a feature film is at least 90 minutes. If I can't come up with something that will hold for a third of that, then how will I be able to develop something for more?

I haven't even gotten to the actual writing part and have seen how difficult the process is. I have a deep respect for those who can write fiction in any medium. It takes a great deal of effort and focus just to get through the initial steps. Maybe I should focus on developing a short-film idea, maybe I'll never finish that screenplay or am not meant for fiction, or maybe the mental breakthrough will happen some ways down the road.

The goal of writing a screenplay is currently out of reach. It's frustrating as hell, but maybe I'll learn something from this journey to expand my horizons.

Lily would like to wish everyone a Happy New Year!

Wreck-It Ralph Review

    Henry David Thoreau said in his novel Walden: "The mass of men lead lives of quite desperation.  What is called resignation is confirmed desperation."  A person faces this moment of resignation when realizing the monotony of his or her life.  How a person handles that moment defines his or her character.     Rich Moore's Wreck-It Ralph, the latest film from Walt Disney Animation Studios, is a beautiful, fully-rendered take on this .     Wreck-It Ralph is the villain of the Donkey Kong-inspired fictional arcade game Fix-It Felix, Jr.  The game sits in Litwak's Arcade with several other games.  After the arcade closes for the day, the games' characters come together in their own universe, living like humans do after a day of work - hanging out together, getting drinks, going home, and having parties.     On the 30th anniversary of Fix-It Felix, Jr.'s release, the characters throw a party to celebrate without inviting Ralph.  Fed up with being seen as only a villain, he decides to "game-jump" - leave his proper game and enter another - in order to prove that he can be a hero.  However, his game-jumping yields the possibility of not only closing his game up for good but also wreaking havoc on other games' viability in the arcade.  His journey leads him to Vanellope von Schweetz, a misfit in the candy-coated fictional racing game Sugar Rush who glitches uncontrollably and is feared to scare away gamers if she is allowed to actively race.  Both see the desire to be more than who they are seen to be, and both work together to try to make their dreams come true.     The sheer detail put into the universe crafted is astounding.  Not only are classics like Pac-Man, Tapper, Street Fighter II, and Q-bert mentioned, their characters play small but significant parts to the film.  The 8-bit style movements of the ancillary Fix-It Felix, Jr. characters start as a gag that slowly becomes a quirk that would have been unnatural to leave out.  Even the send-up of first-person action games in the construct of Hero's Duty and of racing games in the construct of Sugar Rush evolve to define their respective gaming environments.  A film of this nature could have simply rested on its laurels by making as many arcade game and geek culture references like this as possible.     What Wreck-It Ralph does so successfully is run askew of expectations, providing an exciting, engaging, and thought-provoking experience.     The voice acting is top-notch.  John C. Reilly turns on his lovable oaf mode for the title character.  Reilly is a versatile character actor, spanning drama and comedy  with ease, and he has perfected the lovable oaf through several of his films, but his Ralph is imbibed with more heart and self-assurance than usual.  Part outcast, part father-figure, all soul, Ralph is fully realized by Reilly.     Sarah Silverman inverts her raunchy schtick into something annoyingly adorable as Vanellope von Schweetz.  Her approach to Vanellope is very much like Lily Tomlin's Edith Ann character but more fully fleshed out.  Her chemistry with Reilly is impeccable, and her moments of sadness are as significantly felt has her moments of euphoria, and Silverman makes Vanellope a truly memorable figure of innocence.     Alan Tudyk channels Ed Wynn, the voice of the Mad Hatter from the original Walt Disney's Alice in Wonderland, with wonderful effect as King Candy, the hilarious and threatening antagonist of Sugar Rush.  Tudyk takes Wynn's vocal tics and amplifies them to 11.  His versatility is impressive, and he plays off Silverman and Reilly with ease.     Jane Lynch plays a variation of her Sue Sylvester from Glee as Sergeant Calhoun, the lead soldier in the light-gun game Hero's Duty.  Calhoun is someone that should have been in the film Aliens, a strong-willed and determined soldier whose deep fear of her game's antagonists hilariously borders on paranoia.  Her backstory is played for laughs as it should, but Lynch effectively takes that backstory and fills in the emotional gaps Calhoun would have had, making Calhoun an affecting creation.     Jack McBrayer is known for playing the sweet, innocent, "Mayberry-type" character.  What makes his approach to Felix notable in his repertoire is how rooted in Disney tradition Felix is.  Felix is the only character in the film who can do nothing but the right thing.  He's so rooted in in the moral high ground that he cannot help but be attracted to Calhoun, someone who is as determined to do good as he is.  He is Jiminy Cricket, Thumper, Flounder, and Zazu combined, and Felix never comes across as false or overdrawn under McBrayer's approach.     The writing, as done by Phil Johnston and Jennifer Lee, is tight and perfectly structured, using Pixar's Toy Story as a template.  The initial plot point - Ralph wanting a medal to prove he is a hero - gives way to several plot points, such as Vanellope's desire to be a full-fledged racer, Felix falling for the equally heroic Calhoun, Calhoun's backstory of a lost love, and the story of a long lost arcade game in which the character game-jumped and caused both his game and the other game were taken out of the arcade permanently.  The writing is so taut that each of these plot points are resolved and have significance in the overall story, and Johnston and Lee allow the audience to trust them to guide the story effortlessly.  The result is a fast-paced story with heart and soul, the best paced animated film from Disney in a long time.     Rich Moore has a long history with animation, directing several of the finest episodes of The Simpsons and having a hand in the finest episodes of Futurama.  Moore knows how to balance story and themes, and he allows the film to be unpredictable, trusting every actor and crewmember to carry the foundation of the film.     Maybe the most impressive aspect of the film is that foundation.  So many plot points, so many characters, so many references, so many details, but none of it feels overwhelming.  It's all because of the foundation.  Ralph is thirty years old, and being treated as the villain all these years has him facing his own quiet desperation.  He wants to be a hero.  He wants the appreciation Felix gets from the building tenants.  He wants to do good deeds without anyone fearing him.  He wants to break out of that desperation.     From this point, the film begins to address the following - what does it mean to be a hero, and is resignation the point of no return?  Ralph starts out purely selfish in his desire to earn a medal that shows that he's a hero.  After meeting Vanellope and becoming a part of her selfish game of becoming a full-fledged racer, their mutual selfishness gives way to a strong friendship based on doing anything to make the other person's dreams come true.  The natural evolution of their friendship is fantastic, and moments of struggle and hardship are fully felt.  In the end, the point of resignation shows what all of the characters are truly worth, and the film's ending is earned without succumbing to melodrama.     Walt Disney Animation Studios has ironically been seen as a step-sibling to Pixar as of late.  Starting with Tangled, Walt Disney Animation Studios has slowly built itself back to relevance.  With Wreck-It Ralph, Walt Disney Animation Studios has made a film that is on par with Pixar's repertoire and stands as the finest animated Disney film since the Disney Renaissance of the late 80's and early 90's.  Here's hoping that this is the beginning of another Renaissance. Movie Rating: 9.5/10 The best paced animated film Disney has released in a long time. Film Rating: 9/10 The Hero's Journey gives way to how to face the point of resignation - with head held high and the resolve that this is not the end. Disney Film Rating: 9/10 It's not a straight kid's film due to some of the subject matter, but it's perfect fun for the whole family. Video Game Film Rating: 10/10 By not being about a real video game in particular, the film focuses on the characters and on the arcade universe in general, becoming the greatest video game film ever in the process.

My Workout For Tuesday January 21

I earned 728 points for my workout on Fitocracy!

Stretching +2 pts

0:10:00 (+2 pts)

Pull-Up +8 pts

12 reps || assisted || 145 lb (+2 pts)

6 reps || assisted || 130 lb (+2 pts)

4 reps || assisted || 130 lb (+2 pts)

4 reps || assisted || 130 lb (+2 pts)

Bent Over Barbell Row +112 pts

55 lb x 12 reps (+26 pts)

65 lb x 12 reps (+28 pts)

75 lb x 10 reps (+29 pts)

75 lb x 10 reps (+29 pts)

Upright Barbell Row +93 pts

55 lb x 12 reps (+23 pts)

65 lb x 10 reps (+24 pts)

65 lb x 9 reps (+23 pts)

65 lb x 9 reps (+23 pts)

Plank +20 pts

30 sec (+10 pts)

30 sec (+10 pts)

Stiff-Legged Barbell Deadlift +199 pts

55 lb x 12 reps (+46 pts)

65 lb x 12 reps (+49 pts)

75 lb x 10 reps (+52 pts)

75 lb x 10 reps (+52 pts)

Side Plank +42 pts

30 sec (+21 pts)

30 sec (+21 pts)

Dumbbell Shrug +75 pts

20 lb x 12 reps (+18 pts)

25 lb x 12 reps (+19 pts)

30 lb x 10 reps (+19 pts)

30 lb x 10 reps (+19 pts)

Reverse Crunch +76 pts

15 reps (+19 pts)

15 reps (+19 pts)

15 reps (+19 pts)

15 reps (+19 pts)

Dumbbell Bicep Curl +101 pts

15 lb x 12 reps (+26 pts)

20 lb x 12 reps (+27 pts)

25 lb x 6 reps (+25 pts)

25 lb x 5 reps (+23 pts)

Think you can beat me, or want to comment?

Fitocracy is the social fitness community that has helped hundreds of thousands level up their fitness. Start your fitness transformation today!

Now available for free on both iPhone and Android!

Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith Review

    It was the most unexpected of situations.  George Lucas returned to the Star Wars universe by telling the backstory of the famed villain Darth Vader, born Anakin Skywalker, as a new trilogy.  The first film of this new series, Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace, had an unprecedented wave of hype surrounding it.  After its release, it was as if someone let the air out of the room.  While a significant financial success, the overall result was a tarnishing to the saga loved worldwide.  Its follow-up, Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones, tarnished the saga further.  What should have been a triumphant moment for American cinema became a textbook example of screwing with mythology.  Suddenly, everyone was wondering how the man who built a story that has become ingrained in many cultures could be the same man who made Episode I and Episode II.      As the inevitable conclusion to the trilogy approached, the anticipation was more muted.  Audiences wanted to see the next installment but not in the way Lucas intended - people expected the film to pale in comparison to the Original Trilogy, so now they were wondering if it was going to be the trainwreck in mediocrity its two predecessors were.     On May 19, 2005, Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith was released, and while the audiences were right in expecting it to pale to the Original Trilogy, they were surprised that the film was good - in some moments, very good.     Set three years after the end of Episode II, Episode III begins with the final battle of the Clone Wars - the Battle of Coruscant.  Supreme Chancellor Palpatine, the leader of the Galactic Republic, has been kidnapped by the Trade Federation, now under military leadership by General Grevious and Count Dooku.  Jedi Master Obi-Wan Kenobi and Jedi Knight Anakin Skywalker are sent to rescue Palpatine in the midst of the massive space battle.  After the rescue, Anakin is given the honor of being a part of the Jedi Council but without the title of Master.  Furthering his seeds of discontent, he has recurring nightmares that his wife, Padme Amidala, will die in childbirth, pushing him to find power over the Force that the Jedi perceivably lack.  As Kenobi, Anakin's mentor and friend, is sent after Grevious alone, Anakin begins his descent to the Dark Side of the Force, eventually becoming Darth Vader and turning on the people he once considered allies.     Episode III paralells Return of the Jedi less in its structure and more in its nature - it has dual personality of being light-hearted and fun in some moments and dark and heavy in others.  Its duality is both a strength and a weakness, but the overall result is much better than its predecessors.     The acting is more natural than in Episode I and Episode II.  There are still moments of stiff line-reading, but they are not as prevalent as before.  Ewan McGregor continues to be a highlight, fully emulating what made Sir Alec Guinness iconic as Obi-Wan Kenobi while adding enough of his own vigor to make a mark fully on the character.  Natalie Portman finally gives Padme Amidala the personality she needed all this time, and while she still could have done a bit more with her, she at least seems like she's enjoying being in a Star Wars film.  Hayden Christensen still has no chemistry with Portman - just see the apartment balcony scene toward the end of the first act, the worst scene in the film, as an example.  However, he bounces off McGregor very well, showing the tight bond master and apprentice have and how tragic the breaking of the bond is after the turn to the Dark Side.  Christensen may never be physically imposing as Vader was in the Original Trilogy, but he knows how to be deadly and threatening when it counts.     The best role in the film, though, goes to Ian McDiarmid as Palpatine, the once and future Emperor.  He is what the prequels lacked - a thoroughly engaging and imposing villain.  He hams it up once his nature is exposed, but he allows Palpatine to be felt even when he is not on screen.  Ian McDiarmid breathes life into the prequels, showing what they could have been.     Everything in the film is more inspired.  The music by John Williams is alive again, mixing themes and motifs from all of the films to emphasize the emotional journey.  The cinematography by David Tattersall is more fluid, showcasing the action in all of its glory.  The technology has finally caught up with the vision, allowing the visual effects to shine in obvious ways such as the opening battle but also in subtle ways, namely the details in the wonderfully constructed features of the computer-generated Yoda.     Of the whole prequel trilogy storyline, Anakin's downfall and rebirth as Darth Vader is the most interesting and exciting plot point due to its nature.  There's no more meandering around to get to this point in the story.  We've had two films of build-up, most of it unnecessary.  This is when all of the action happens.  This is when all of the tragedy strikes.  This is when the audience cares.  This alone would make it a better film than Episode I and Episode II.     What makes it much better, and what is the biggest surprise, is that George Lucas fully flexes his screenwriting and directing muscles.     First is the surprising focus prevalent throughout the film.  The focus begins at the introduction with Anakin and Obi-Wan flying into the Battle of Coruscant.  Once their ships appear on-screen, the camera follows them into the battle, showing the scope of the battle without focusing on other random individuals for too long.  This focus also allows us to see how brotherly Obi-Wan and Anakin have become.  The audience has a connection.  Their banter becomes hokey, sometimes too hokey, but we are having fun with them.      In fact, about the first half of the film is mostly fun with a little foreboding menace.  About the second half is all menace.  Both halves work very well on their own, with one half not taking itself too seriously and allowing us to enjoy the ride while the other half becoming the depths of the Dark Side it needs to be and allowing us to feel for these characters.     Emphasizing the dark foreboding is Lucas borrowing the cross-cutting technique his close friend Francis Ford Coppola mastered.  Palpatine's formation of the Galactic Empire is cross-cut with Anakin's assassination of the leaders of the Trade Federation.  The birth of Luke and Leia is cross-cut with the birth of Darth Vader.  Both are done well, and both show the director Lucas was and still can be.     However, while the overall results are good to very good, its the details that hold the film back from greatness.     The lightsaber duels are well executed, but some moments devolve into pure visual splendor instead of maintaining emotional resonance.  This happens early on in the Anakin/Obi-Wan duel and is prevalent in the Palpatine/Yoda duel.  The music saves the latter duel, and the former has several intense moments that help keep it grounded overall.     The duality of the film becomes a struggle in the second act.  Everything involving Obi-Wan is fun and exciting, while everything involving Anakin is increasingly dark.  At times, the feeling is schizophrenic, throwing the audience in too many emotional directions to make sense.     The moment of Anakin's turn to the Dark Side could never reach the legend fans made it to be, but the moment becomes almost unintentionally funny due to stiff line-readings and poorly placed sound effects.  This is the most important moment in the entire saga to date, yet it doesn't resonate the way it should.  If the third act wasn't as strong as it is, this scene could have ruined the entire film.     The scene involving the birth of the Darth Vader we all know is well done until the end.  In a moment now immortalized as "FrankenVader," Lucas decided to pay homage to Frankenstein at the worst possible moment, ruining another resonating moment with something unintentionally funny, capping it off with a misguided scream from Vader.     Lucas also tries too hard to bridge the Original Trilogy and the prequels together with this film, either relying heavily on fan service without really getting into a better understanding of things or only providing half-explanations due to bridging the films being more important than making the ideas work on their own.     The maximum enjoyment factor in Episode III is found when watching with context provided from the Original Trilogy, but unlike Episode I and Episode II, there's a story worth telling within its runtime, and it tells it well.  It doesn't reach the quality of the Original Trilogy, but Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith is everything audiences wanted the entire prequel trilogy to be - good sci-fi fantasy. Blu-Ray Observations With technology catching up to how Lucas wanted to present his films, the Blu-Ray for Episode III is near-reference quality.  The visuals are balanced very well, and the colors are vivid.  Because of the digital nature of the production, the sterility of the computer-generated atmospheres Lucas inadvertently created come in full force, emphasizing how far away the film is visually from the Original Trilogy.  The audio, again, is superb, this time represented by how the hum and clashes of the lightsabers are crisp, clear, and impactful.  Overall, a great presentation. Movie Rating: 7.5/10 One-half light-hearted action and one-half journey into darkness, the two halves don't gel perfectly together but result in an exciting story. Film Rating: 7/10 What should be the key moments don't resonate, but the music emphasizes the heart of the matter, and what surrounds those missed opportunities carries surprising depth and craft. Star Wars Film Rating: 7/10 This is the prequel audiences wanted the other two to be.  It's not on par with the Original Trilogy, but unlike the other two prequels, this one is worth seeing at least once. Blu-Ray Rating: 8.5/10 Finally, the technology catches up with Lucas' vision, and the Blu-Ray presents it in full splendor.  However, it also shows how flawed that vision was with how sterile some of the environments are.

A Schaumburg February.

My Workout For Saturday January 11

I earned 111 points for my workout on Fitocracy!

Running (treadmill) +16 pts

0:05:00 || 0.3 mi || 1 % (+16 pts)

Cycling (stationary) +79 pts

0:07:30 || 2 mi || 7 % (+49 pts)

0:06:20 || 1.5 mi || 5 % (+30 pts)

Chin-Up +8 pts

12 reps || assisted || 145 lb (+2 pts)

8 reps || assisted || 130 lb (+2 pts)

7 reps || assisted || 130 lb (+2 pts)

4 reps || assisted || 115 lb (+2 pts)

Dips - Triceps Version +8 pts

12 reps || assisted || 145 lb (+2 pts)

12 reps || assisted || 130 lb (+2 pts)

4 reps || assisted || 115 lb (+2 pts)

5 reps || assisted || 115 lb (+2 pts)

Think you can beat me, or want to comment?

Fitocracy is the social fitness community that has helped hundreds of thousands level up their fitness. Start your fitness transformation today!

Now available for free on both iPhone and Android!

My Workout For Tuesday January 14

I earned 958 points for my workout on Fitocracy!

Dumbbell Bench Press +203 pts

30 lb x 12 reps (+49 pts)

35 lb x 12 reps (+52 pts)

40 lb x 8 reps (+53 pts)

40 lb x 6 reps (+49 pts)

Barbell Deadlift +190 pts

55 lb x 12 reps (+46 pts)

65 lb x 10 reps (+48 pts)

65 lb x 10 reps (+48 pts)

65 lb x 10 reps (+48 pts)

Stretching +2 pts

0:10:00 (+2 pts)

Barbell Squat +199 pts

55 lb x 12 reps (+46 pts)

65 lb x 12 reps (+49 pts)

75 lb x 10 reps (+52 pts)

75 lb x 10 reps (+52 pts)

Seated Dumbbell Shoulder Press +160 pts

15 lb x 12 reps (+41 pts)

20 lb x 8 reps (+41 pts)

20 lb x 7 reps (+40 pts)

20 lb x 6 reps (+38 pts)

Dips - Triceps Version +8 pts

12 reps || assisted || 130 lb (+2 pts)

6 reps || assisted || 115 lb (+2 pts)

5 reps || assisted || 115 lb (+2 pts)

4 reps || assisted || 115 lb (+2 pts)

Incline Dumbbell Bench Press +180 pts

25 lb x 12 reps (+46 pts)

30 lb x 12 reps (+49 pts)

35 lb x 4 reps (+39 pts)

35 lb x 6 reps (+46 pts)

Standing Calf Raises +16 pts

12 reps || weighted || 45 lb (+4 pts)

12 reps || weighted || 55 lb (+4 pts)

12 reps || weighted || 65 lb (+4 pts)

10 reps || weighted || 75 lb (+4 pts)

Think you can beat me, or want to comment?

Fitocracy is the social fitness community that has helped hundreds of thousands level up their fitness. Start your fitness transformation today!

Now available for free on both iPhone and Android!

The Dark Knight Rises Review

    The final film of a trilogy is the most difficult one to pull off.  Everyone involved feels like they have to increase the scope of the story, but the trick is to maintain the spirit of the series without giving into excess.  Some trilogies, like Byran Singer's X-Men series and Sam Raimi's Spider-Man series, have a third film that almost everyone would like to forget ever existed.  Some third films, like Sergio Leone's The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly and Pixar's Toy Story 3, stand as masterworks in their own right and help transcend their representative series.  And then there are third films like Return of the Jedi and The Godfather Part III that are excellent in moments and forgettable in others.     Christopher Nolan started a new Batman trilogy with Batman Begins, one of the finest origin stories told in the comic-book superhero genre, and then continued with The Dark Knight, a film that expanded beyound genre limits and became not only a classic crime drama about anarchy and heroism but also one of the best films of its decade.     With The Dark Knight Rises, Nolan concludes his fantastic series with a third film that may not be entirely of the same level of its predecessor but is a prime example of how to complete a series in style and quality.     It's been eight years since the reign of terror by The Joker and the death of District Attorney and "white knight" Harvey Dent.  Batman has taken the blame for his death and other deaths at the hands of Dent, causing Batman to become an outcast but paving the way for a more peaceful Gotham City.  Commissioner Jim Gordon, knowing the truth about the night Dent died, keeps the lie up to keep the peace in the city.  One of the few people that believe in Batman's innocence is idealist cop John Blake, a man who is taken under Gordon's wing.  Bruce Wayne has retired Batman and become the Howard Hughes of Gotham City, much to the concern of his butler Alfred and his armorer Lucius Fox.      However, two threats arrive to destabilize the city and necessitate the return of Batman.  The main threat is Bane, a masked brute who, forged by a foreign prison and saved by The League of Shadows, plans to take control of Gotham City, leave it in mob rule, and let it rot from the inside out.  The other is a cat burglar named Selina Kyle who acts as a "Robin Hood" for her self-interest, taking advantage of any and every situation, such as stealing a valuable pearl necklace from Wayne Manor during a fundraiser, kidnapping a congressman for leverage on a deal with shady businessmen, and working with and against Batman at the turn of a dime.     This is a lot of information to take in, which leads to the film's main flaw - it takes an hour or so for the film to truly start, and that hour is filled with too many false starts and exposition to get pulled into it.  The story, developed by Chris Nolan and David S. Goyer, and the script, written by Chris Nolan and his brother Jonathan, is ambitious in scope and content, and the meandering is an unavoidable consequence.  Unlike Chris Nolan's previous film, Inception, the meandering doesn't mean that the film is too long - just that the structure needed to be refined.      Case in point - the first meeting between John Blake and Bruce Wayne.  Blake implores Wayne to bring back Batman for the sake of an injured Gordon.  During this discussion, Blake goes into exposition about his past, how he first met Batman and Bruce Wayne, and hints that he knows Batman's identity.  It's a well-acted scene that doesn't move because of its necessity to relay as much information as possible to the audience.  It's a necessary scene that needs rearranging to improve the flow.     The overall thread of the idealist John Blake is wonderfully done.  Joseph Gordon-Levitt shines as the orphan turned cop who sees the world in an optimistic light in spite of the world devolving around him.  He exudes a determination and strength as Gotham's last light.  He starts out wanting to be the white knight but slowly realizes that even the whitest knight has a touch of grey.  He represents the struggle of, as Gordon put it, structures becoming shackles, and Joseph Gordon-Levitt carries that burden superbly.     Gary Oldman, as the other important part of this thread, does an amazing job as Commissioner Gordon.  Gordon started out as that idealist cop, became affected by how the world came down around him, was given a spark of hope by the arrival of Batman, and eventually became the "grey knight," the man who did was was necessary to preserve the peace, even if sacrificing the truth destroyed his marriage and faith in humanity.  He has been long recognized as one of the finest character actors of his generation, and Gary Oldman shows more and more why he deserves the accolades he has still yet to receive.     The thread involving Selina Kyle is the self-contained thread, not requiring any knowledge of the prior films, and it is the best thread of the bunch.  Anne Hathaway steals every scene she is in, vamping it up and having as much fun as possible as the expert thief who does what is necessary and is working toward getting a clean slate.  Selina Kyle is known in the comic-book world as Catwoman, but she is never called that moniker in this film, and the role and the film is all the better for it.  She's smart, sexy, strong, and soulful, and Anne Hathaway does the role justice and almost steals the film with it.     The antagonist thread of the film, all involving Bane and references to the League of Shadows, is the weakest part of the film, but it does have its moments.  Bane's introduction, an in-flight infiltration and escape, is a spectacular set piece that feels inert, not providing the ignition the film needs.  Even Bane's stock exchange takeover seems too small an explosion for the film's lift-off.  It isn't until the city takeover when the audience is pulled into the action, with Bane's menacing visage and stature commandeering the screen with purpose.  His fights with Batman are tense, brutal, and exhilarating.  His backstory, although underdeveloped, provides just enough brushstrokes to give Bane some color.     Tom Hardy, bulking up for the role, fully involves himself as Bane.  His physicality is something of a first in the series - Batman has always been the dominating physical presence, but Bane easily takes control in this film.  His speech, somewhat muffled by the mask, is hard to understand at times, and is inconsistent in the accent - for a brief moment, Hardy inadvertently performs a Sean Connery impersonation.  Nevertheless, Bane is an intimidating figure, and Tom Hardy is more than up to the task to portray Bane as the menace he is meant to be.     The protagonist thread, the one dovetailing not only the threads within the film but the entire series, is wholly fulfilling if structured oddly at the beginning of the film.  Having Bruce Wayne be a recluse, then become Batman again, then be forced to stop, and then become Batman again, at least in the way the film does it, is tonally awkward, but it gives all of the actors the moments they deserve.  The theme of this thread - what it takes for a dark knight to save himself from the darkness - is expressed expertly, and the conclusion is almost perfect.     Morgan Freeman, having a more diminished role this time around, still provides levity to these serious proceedings as Lucius Fox, and his repartee with Bruce Wayne is still electrifying.  Marion Cotillard, as potential Bruce Wayne love interest and Wayne Enterprises board member Miranda Tate, doesn't have the greatest chemistry with Bruce Wayne, but she has a tenderness that balances her calculating nature, and although Miranda Tate is not developed enough, Marion Cotillard is a captivating presence.     Michael Caine, as Batman's and Bruce Wayne's batman Alfred, is the legend he is known to be.  As the heart of the series, Alfred is the sole reason the Wayne name still gives hope, still remains viable.  His role is given several monologues, and while some of them come off as unnecessary, Caine's delivery is nothing short of extraordinary.  He is more than a servant to Bruce Wayne and Batman - he is the last father figure he has.  The final moments of the film with Alfred are the most moving of the entire series, and it is all due to subtle care that Michael Caine has taken to develop Alfred.     It takes a bold and daring actor to give a comic-book superhero some gravitas, and throughout all three films, Christian Bale has evolved as Bruce Wayne and Batman, with his work in this film being the finest in the series.  From the first film on, Bruce Wayne has been a shell of his former self, and his dedication to being Batman is as much out of a desire to do good as it is out of a need to give himself purpose.  Bale grounds and centers the film with a man who cannot let go of his anger, seeing himself as the man Gotham needs him to be while eventually realizing the man Alfred and the deceased Wayne family would have wanted him to be.  Throughout the struggles he faces, he finds solace in a woman who is looking for the clean slate he so desperately needs.  Christian Bale brings the series-long arc full circle, becoming the actor everyone will identify with Bruce Wayne and Batman above all others, and giving the film world one of the finest performances in the genre.     Cinematographer Wally Pfister paints the screen with Oscar-caliber imagery.  The opening shot of Bane's introduction in an open field is something straight out of an epic film.  The browns of the pit the bore Bane, the whites and greys of a Gotham under siege, the blacks and blues of the city at night and the Batcave, and the varying colors of Wayne Manor all leave an indelible mark.  He won an Oscar for his work on Inception, but Wally Pfister tops himself with the work done in this film.     Composer Hans Zimmer comes back alone this time, effectively using the themes developed with James Newton-Howard in the previous two films, and creating a couple of new ideas that work to varying degrees on their own but are ingrained in the film successfully.  The simple piano-based motif of Selina Kyle is beautiful, capturing the sly yet longing nature of the character, and the percussive chant of Bane's motif stays in the mind and eventually turns from an ominous chant to a motivating positive force, showing how Hans Zimmer can turn preconceived notions on their head.     With the flaws and strengths, it all falls on the shoulders of director Christopher Nolan.  His work with the actors is still surprisingly impressive, his eye for set pieces continues to astonish, and his ambition serves him well for the most part.  However, his ambition causes the series to take a turn from the realism and believeability of The Dark Knight to expected comic-book superhero fare.  Nolan tries to make grand statements about the world at large, but the statements don't cut through like they did in the previous film, especially when trying to make reference to class struggles.     However, what the film lacks in biting commentary is made up by the scope of the story of Batman and the world around him.  The thrills are more blunt than before, but therein lies the charm of this film - it may be the most fun a story as dark as this could be.  The realism is gone, but the craftsmanship is undeniable, and the story, once it gets going, is a true roller-coaster ride.  Christopher Nolan may have changed the trajectory of the series away from what it could have been, but he relishes in the destination he has created, and the joy he had creating this universe is felt in every frame.  He even perfectly caps the series arc of Bruce Wayne with a quote from A Tale of Two Cities - "It is a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to than I have ever known."      The end result is a conclusion of a series that is crying for a different set-up.  The difficulty in judging this film is in the expectations - had The Dark Knight not existed or at least been a different film, this film could have been the standard-bearer for all comic-book superhero films to follow.  However, The Dark Knight does exist, and paraphrasing the Joker in that film, it changed things forever.  The Dark Knight Rises will always pale in comparison to its predecessor because it lacks transcendence, but it stands as one of the finest films of the genre and a wholly satisfying conclusion to one of the best film trilogies, and that is all for which one could hope. Movie Rating: 9/10 A meandering and start-stop first hour gives way to a thrilling, emotional, and fun conclusion. Film Rating: 8/10 It pales next to The Dark Knight, and its commentary is toothless, but how it concludes the main series arc is excellent. Comic-Book Superhero Film Rating: 9/10 It may not be the deepest, but it is one of the best, and it may be the definition of "serious fun." Batman Film Rating: 8.5/10 On par with Batman Begins, but following The Dark Knight means that it could have been more.

My Workout For Friday January 17

I earned 840 points for my workout on Fitocracy!

Moving boxes +840 pts

5:00:00 || Easy (+600 pts)

2:00:00 || Easy (+240 pts)

Think you can beat me, or want to comment?

Fitocracy is the social fitness community that has helped hundreds of thousands level up their fitness. Start your fitness transformation today!

Now available for free on both iPhone and Android!