My Workout For Saturday February 01

This is why you can’t play frisbee with Cookie Monster. 

My Workout For Saturday January 18

I earned 525 points for my workout on Fitocracy!

Moving boxes +480 pts

4:00:00 || Easy (+480 pts)

Shoveling snow +45 pts

0:15:00 (+45 pts)

Think you can beat me, or want to comment?

Fitocracy is the social fitness community that has helped hundreds of thousands level up their fitness. Start your fitness transformation today!

Now available for free on both iPhone and Android!

My Workout For Thursday January 30

I earned 794 points for my workout on Fitocracy!

Stretching +2 pts

0:10:00 (+2 pts)

Barbell Deadlift +210 pts

65 lb x 12 reps (+49 pts)

85 lb x 10 reps (+55 pts)

85 lb x 8 reps (+53 pts)

85 lb x 8 reps (+53 pts)

Dips - Triceps Version +10 pts

1 reps (+2 pts)

12 reps || assisted || 130 lb (+2 pts)

8 reps || assisted || 115 lb (+2 pts)

7 reps || assisted || 115 lb (+2 pts)

4 reps || assisted || 100 lb (+2 pts)

Standing Dumbbell Shoulder Press +175 pts

15 lb x 12 reps (+44 pts)

20 lb x 12 reps (+47 pts)

25 lb x 7 reps (+46 pts)

25 lb x 4 reps (+38 pts)

Standing Calf Raises +18 pts

12 reps || weighted || 65 lb (+4 pts)

12 reps || weighted || 85 lb (+5 pts)

12 reps || weighted || 95 lb (+5 pts)

10 reps || weighted || 105 lb (+4 pts)

Dumbbell Bench Press +155 pts

30 lb x 12 reps (+49 pts)

40 lb x 12 reps (+56 pts)

45 lb x 5 reps (+50 pts)

Tried to do a fourth set, but my body couldn't push through. Next time...

Barbell Squat +224 pts

65 lb x 12 reps (+49 pts)

85 lb x 12 reps (+57 pts)

95 lb x 10 reps (+59 pts)

95 lb x 10 reps (+59 pts)

Think you can beat me, or want to comment?

Fitocracy is the social fitness community that has helped hundreds of thousands level up their fitness. Start your fitness transformation today!

Now available for free on both iPhone and Android!

Lily would like to wish everyone a Happy New Year!

Carrie Fisher’s legacy will never be forgotten. 

Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith Review

    It was the most unexpected of situations.  George Lucas returned to the Star Wars universe by telling the backstory of the famed villain Darth Vader, born Anakin Skywalker, as a new trilogy.  The first film of this new series, Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace, had an unprecedented wave of hype surrounding it.  After its release, it was as if someone let the air out of the room.  While a significant financial success, the overall result was a tarnishing to the saga loved worldwide.  Its follow-up, Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones, tarnished the saga further.  What should have been a triumphant moment for American cinema became a textbook example of screwing with mythology.  Suddenly, everyone was wondering how the man who built a story that has become ingrained in many cultures could be the same man who made Episode I and Episode II.      As the inevitable conclusion to the trilogy approached, the anticipation was more muted.  Audiences wanted to see the next installment but not in the way Lucas intended - people expected the film to pale in comparison to the Original Trilogy, so now they were wondering if it was going to be the trainwreck in mediocrity its two predecessors were.     On May 19, 2005, Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith was released, and while the audiences were right in expecting it to pale to the Original Trilogy, they were surprised that the film was good - in some moments, very good.     Set three years after the end of Episode II, Episode III begins with the final battle of the Clone Wars - the Battle of Coruscant.  Supreme Chancellor Palpatine, the leader of the Galactic Republic, has been kidnapped by the Trade Federation, now under military leadership by General Grevious and Count Dooku.  Jedi Master Obi-Wan Kenobi and Jedi Knight Anakin Skywalker are sent to rescue Palpatine in the midst of the massive space battle.  After the rescue, Anakin is given the honor of being a part of the Jedi Council but without the title of Master.  Furthering his seeds of discontent, he has recurring nightmares that his wife, Padme Amidala, will die in childbirth, pushing him to find power over the Force that the Jedi perceivably lack.  As Kenobi, Anakin's mentor and friend, is sent after Grevious alone, Anakin begins his descent to the Dark Side of the Force, eventually becoming Darth Vader and turning on the people he once considered allies.     Episode III paralells Return of the Jedi less in its structure and more in its nature - it has dual personality of being light-hearted and fun in some moments and dark and heavy in others.  Its duality is both a strength and a weakness, but the overall result is much better than its predecessors.     The acting is more natural than in Episode I and Episode II.  There are still moments of stiff line-reading, but they are not as prevalent as before.  Ewan McGregor continues to be a highlight, fully emulating what made Sir Alec Guinness iconic as Obi-Wan Kenobi while adding enough of his own vigor to make a mark fully on the character.  Natalie Portman finally gives Padme Amidala the personality she needed all this time, and while she still could have done a bit more with her, she at least seems like she's enjoying being in a Star Wars film.  Hayden Christensen still has no chemistry with Portman - just see the apartment balcony scene toward the end of the first act, the worst scene in the film, as an example.  However, he bounces off McGregor very well, showing the tight bond master and apprentice have and how tragic the breaking of the bond is after the turn to the Dark Side.  Christensen may never be physically imposing as Vader was in the Original Trilogy, but he knows how to be deadly and threatening when it counts.     The best role in the film, though, goes to Ian McDiarmid as Palpatine, the once and future Emperor.  He is what the prequels lacked - a thoroughly engaging and imposing villain.  He hams it up once his nature is exposed, but he allows Palpatine to be felt even when he is not on screen.  Ian McDiarmid breathes life into the prequels, showing what they could have been.     Everything in the film is more inspired.  The music by John Williams is alive again, mixing themes and motifs from all of the films to emphasize the emotional journey.  The cinematography by David Tattersall is more fluid, showcasing the action in all of its glory.  The technology has finally caught up with the vision, allowing the visual effects to shine in obvious ways such as the opening battle but also in subtle ways, namely the details in the wonderfully constructed features of the computer-generated Yoda.     Of the whole prequel trilogy storyline, Anakin's downfall and rebirth as Darth Vader is the most interesting and exciting plot point due to its nature.  There's no more meandering around to get to this point in the story.  We've had two films of build-up, most of it unnecessary.  This is when all of the action happens.  This is when all of the tragedy strikes.  This is when the audience cares.  This alone would make it a better film than Episode I and Episode II.     What makes it much better, and what is the biggest surprise, is that George Lucas fully flexes his screenwriting and directing muscles.     First is the surprising focus prevalent throughout the film.  The focus begins at the introduction with Anakin and Obi-Wan flying into the Battle of Coruscant.  Once their ships appear on-screen, the camera follows them into the battle, showing the scope of the battle without focusing on other random individuals for too long.  This focus also allows us to see how brotherly Obi-Wan and Anakin have become.  The audience has a connection.  Their banter becomes hokey, sometimes too hokey, but we are having fun with them.      In fact, about the first half of the film is mostly fun with a little foreboding menace.  About the second half is all menace.  Both halves work very well on their own, with one half not taking itself too seriously and allowing us to enjoy the ride while the other half becoming the depths of the Dark Side it needs to be and allowing us to feel for these characters.     Emphasizing the dark foreboding is Lucas borrowing the cross-cutting technique his close friend Francis Ford Coppola mastered.  Palpatine's formation of the Galactic Empire is cross-cut with Anakin's assassination of the leaders of the Trade Federation.  The birth of Luke and Leia is cross-cut with the birth of Darth Vader.  Both are done well, and both show the director Lucas was and still can be.     However, while the overall results are good to very good, its the details that hold the film back from greatness.     The lightsaber duels are well executed, but some moments devolve into pure visual splendor instead of maintaining emotional resonance.  This happens early on in the Anakin/Obi-Wan duel and is prevalent in the Palpatine/Yoda duel.  The music saves the latter duel, and the former has several intense moments that help keep it grounded overall.     The duality of the film becomes a struggle in the second act.  Everything involving Obi-Wan is fun and exciting, while everything involving Anakin is increasingly dark.  At times, the feeling is schizophrenic, throwing the audience in too many emotional directions to make sense.     The moment of Anakin's turn to the Dark Side could never reach the legend fans made it to be, but the moment becomes almost unintentionally funny due to stiff line-readings and poorly placed sound effects.  This is the most important moment in the entire saga to date, yet it doesn't resonate the way it should.  If the third act wasn't as strong as it is, this scene could have ruined the entire film.     The scene involving the birth of the Darth Vader we all know is well done until the end.  In a moment now immortalized as "FrankenVader," Lucas decided to pay homage to Frankenstein at the worst possible moment, ruining another resonating moment with something unintentionally funny, capping it off with a misguided scream from Vader.     Lucas also tries too hard to bridge the Original Trilogy and the prequels together with this film, either relying heavily on fan service without really getting into a better understanding of things or only providing half-explanations due to bridging the films being more important than making the ideas work on their own.     The maximum enjoyment factor in Episode III is found when watching with context provided from the Original Trilogy, but unlike Episode I and Episode II, there's a story worth telling within its runtime, and it tells it well.  It doesn't reach the quality of the Original Trilogy, but Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith is everything audiences wanted the entire prequel trilogy to be - good sci-fi fantasy. Blu-Ray Observations With technology catching up to how Lucas wanted to present his films, the Blu-Ray for Episode III is near-reference quality.  The visuals are balanced very well, and the colors are vivid.  Because of the digital nature of the production, the sterility of the computer-generated atmospheres Lucas inadvertently created come in full force, emphasizing how far away the film is visually from the Original Trilogy.  The audio, again, is superb, this time represented by how the hum and clashes of the lightsabers are crisp, clear, and impactful.  Overall, a great presentation. Movie Rating: 7.5/10 One-half light-hearted action and one-half journey into darkness, the two halves don't gel perfectly together but result in an exciting story. Film Rating: 7/10 What should be the key moments don't resonate, but the music emphasizes the heart of the matter, and what surrounds those missed opportunities carries surprising depth and craft. Star Wars Film Rating: 7/10 This is the prequel audiences wanted the other two to be.  It's not on par with the Original Trilogy, but unlike the other two prequels, this one is worth seeing at least once. Blu-Ray Rating: 8.5/10 Finally, the technology catches up with Lucas' vision, and the Blu-Ray presents it in full splendor.  However, it also shows how flawed that vision was with how sterile some of the environments are.

The Amazing Spider-Man Review

    It's been ten years since Sam Raimi unleashed his vision of the Marvel Comics superhero Spider-Man onto global audiences.   With dry wit, tight action, impressive structure, and soulful acting, Sam Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy became the definition of the comic-book superhero film series for the 21st cetury, with Spider-Man 2 being the golden standard alongside Superman: The Movie for what the genre can and should be.     The series' importance carried through even after the release of Christopher Nolan's masterful and game-changing Batman tale, The Dark Knight.  While Nolan focused on rooting superhero mythology into an image of the current state of the world, Raimi followed the path of the genre as a means of escape, showing that both approaches can exist with equal success.      The third Spider-Man film failed to catch a fire among audiences, meaning that a new story from a new perspective was wanted.  Enter Marc Webb, director of (500) Days of Summer, to take the reins of Spider-Man and tell his own story of the hero from the beginning with The Amazing Spider-Man.     The trajectory of the beginning hits all of the basic notes of the origin story in the previous series' first film.   Peter Parker is a geeky New York high school student who doesn't fit in.  He lives with his Uncle Ben and Aunt May, inadvertently wanders near a secret project that leads to a radioactive spider biting him and giving him superpowers.  At first, he struggles to get comfortable with his abilities, but a personal tragedy brings him perspective and a raison d'etre, and a threat to New York City shows him the man he needs to be.     With there being only ten years separating the previous series' first film with this one, it could have been either lazy or boring to cover a lot of the similar ground.  Then why does it feel different?     1.) We are shown who Peter's parents are and, to a degree, why they left them in Ben and May's care.  This has a profound effect on Peter, showing why he is so intelligent, has a chip on his shoulders, and almost prefers not to fit in with his classmates.     2.) The love interest is Gwen Stacy, a geeky fellow student who works as an intern at Oscorp, the place where Peter's father's colleague, Dr. Curt Connors does research, and the place where Peter eventually gets his powers.     3.) The webbing he shoots is man-made, not an organic effect from the bite.  This emphasizes his intelligence and well as provides a sense of danger in a couple scenes.     4.) Spider-Man is seen as a vigilante more than a hero.  The police, led by Captain Stacy, want to lock him up as a criminal due to his outside-the-law crime-fighting activities.     5.) The criminal who caused Peter's personal tragedy isn't caught.  This gives Peter a sense of failure that he carries throughout his endeavors, knowing that what happened to him could easily happen to someone else.     These changes, as well as other stylistic choices, all keep the film fresh and engrossing, allowing the audience to see it as its own entity without reminding them of the previous origin story.  The comic-book universe has several storylines for one character that play out, some in parallel with each other, and this is something that could be difficult to accept on film. Credit must be given to everyone working on the film for trusting the audience to give the film its own chance.     The script, written by James Vanderbilt, Alvin Sargent, and Harry Potter alum Steve Kloves, is tight, having a constant sense of propulsion while allowing the audience to delve deep enough into the characters to want to join in on the ride.  It tries to balance the grittiness and reality of Nolan's Batman series with the dry wit and fun of Raimi's Spider-Man series, and, for the most part, works well.     The main actors shine thoroughly.  Andrew Garfield has immense talent, as his work in The Social Network and Never Let Me Go shows, but it is still a surprise how natural a fit he is as Peter Parker/Spider-Man.  He gives Peter the arrogance, heart, humor, doubt, and strength that fits perfectly for this film.  Garfield understood how to interpret Peter in this universe, and his interpretation is wonderful.     Emma Stone comes off as strong, snarky, tender, and sexy as Gwen Stacy.  Gwen's personality could take any man on, but she lets her guard down with Peter, and the tender moments with Peter are a sight to behold.  Her chemistry with Garfield is natural and flawless.  Even if the rest of the film was terrible, every scene with Stone and Garfield together would still make it worth watching.     Rhys Ifans as Dr. Connors is a conflicted man struggling with keeping a secret from Peter about his parents' whereabouts and with a formula that gives him his arm back but at the cost of becoming The Lizard.  Ifans' filmography shows his range, and he maintains the humanity of Connors when the script sometimes forces him into the Lizard's psyche completely.     The supporting roles work as well as they need to, but some are better than others.  Martin Sheen takes his role in Wall Street and focuses more on how he manages home life, making Uncle Ben the father figure we love and respect.  Sally Field isn't given enough time with Garfield to develop the connection they need, but her Aunt May is still welcoming.  C. Thomas Howell is a great embodiment of how the world sees Spider-Man.  Irrfan Khan plays a one-note character, but as one of Dr. Connors' bosses, he has plenty of menace.     However, of the supporting roles, Dennis Leary is the standout as Captain Stacy, Gwen's father.  His acting chops were honed on his show Rescue Me, and he takes the abrasiveness and New York pride of Tommy Gavin and files it down to a more sensitive, fatherly base.  He feels threatened by Spider-Man as the superhero is doing the job that the police are supposed to do.  This tension carries through the dinner with his family and Peter as a guest, and when he sees Spider-Man's true identity, he understands that while he may not agree with the concept of Spider-Man, he knows that the hero is an asset to the city and not a hindrance.  Leary is superb as the moral center of the film.     Director Marc Webb started out with music videos and short films before his impressive feature debut, (500) Days of Summer.  That film showed how comfortable he is with a good script and great actors, and that carries through here.  The best moments are the smaller ones, not only the scenes between Peter and Gwen but also when Spider-Man rescues a child from a threatened vehicle, when Ben and Peter are together, when Peter begins to get comfortable with the new powers, when Spider-Man is in full smart-ass mode, and when Spider-Man goes to the sewer to pursue the Lizard.  Webb understands the power of a delicate touch, and when he applies that touch, the film reaches the greatness of Spider-Man 2.     However, there are enough flaws that keep it from reaching those levels consistently.     First, the construct of the villain doesn't work as well as it should.  The design of the Lizard is too artificial, and when the Lizard starts talking about how he wants to create perfect beings, it's jarring because of how Dr. Connors was never wanting that to begin with.  The Lizard is an interesting villain in the comics, but he doesn't fit with the grittiness of the film.     The post-credit scene is also disconcerting because it introduces an unnamed figure and randomly expands the Parker's parents storyline and Oscorp into the sequel.  It takes away from the film holding up as its own entity, but at least it allows for future films to give this one some additional meaning.     The music by James Horner is faceless.  While Danny Elfman's work in the previous series didn't have a strong theme, it fit the film better than this score does this film.  Horner knows how to up the drama, but nothing from the music is memorable.     The Amazing Spider-Man is not the greatest Spider-Man film ever made, but it matches the first film in the previous series in quality, and the trajectory of the story along with the acting and directing makes me excited to see where this series goes next, and that is most important. Movie Rating: 8/10 The action is good, the drama even better.  The villain isn't a good fit, but this film doesn't skimp on excitement. Film Rating: 8/10 The sense of loss, doubt, responsibility, and love carries the film effortlessly, and the scenes with Gwen and Peter together are perfectly done. Comic-Book Superhero Film Rating: 8/10 It tries to balance Nolan's grittiness with Raimi's sense of fun, and while it doesn't work completely, it's a great example of how good the genre can be. Spider-Man Film Rating: 8.5/10 It may not be as fun as Raimi's series, but it has more heart and as much depth, and it's as good as the first film in that series.

The Dark Knight Rises Review

    The final film of a trilogy is the most difficult one to pull off.  Everyone involved feels like they have to increase the scope of the story, but the trick is to maintain the spirit of the series without giving into excess.  Some trilogies, like Byran Singer's X-Men series and Sam Raimi's Spider-Man series, have a third film that almost everyone would like to forget ever existed.  Some third films, like Sergio Leone's The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly and Pixar's Toy Story 3, stand as masterworks in their own right and help transcend their representative series.  And then there are third films like Return of the Jedi and The Godfather Part III that are excellent in moments and forgettable in others.     Christopher Nolan started a new Batman trilogy with Batman Begins, one of the finest origin stories told in the comic-book superhero genre, and then continued with The Dark Knight, a film that expanded beyound genre limits and became not only a classic crime drama about anarchy and heroism but also one of the best films of its decade.     With The Dark Knight Rises, Nolan concludes his fantastic series with a third film that may not be entirely of the same level of its predecessor but is a prime example of how to complete a series in style and quality.     It's been eight years since the reign of terror by The Joker and the death of District Attorney and "white knight" Harvey Dent.  Batman has taken the blame for his death and other deaths at the hands of Dent, causing Batman to become an outcast but paving the way for a more peaceful Gotham City.  Commissioner Jim Gordon, knowing the truth about the night Dent died, keeps the lie up to keep the peace in the city.  One of the few people that believe in Batman's innocence is idealist cop John Blake, a man who is taken under Gordon's wing.  Bruce Wayne has retired Batman and become the Howard Hughes of Gotham City, much to the concern of his butler Alfred and his armorer Lucius Fox.      However, two threats arrive to destabilize the city and necessitate the return of Batman.  The main threat is Bane, a masked brute who, forged by a foreign prison and saved by The League of Shadows, plans to take control of Gotham City, leave it in mob rule, and let it rot from the inside out.  The other is a cat burglar named Selina Kyle who acts as a "Robin Hood" for her self-interest, taking advantage of any and every situation, such as stealing a valuable pearl necklace from Wayne Manor during a fundraiser, kidnapping a congressman for leverage on a deal with shady businessmen, and working with and against Batman at the turn of a dime.     This is a lot of information to take in, which leads to the film's main flaw - it takes an hour or so for the film to truly start, and that hour is filled with too many false starts and exposition to get pulled into it.  The story, developed by Chris Nolan and David S. Goyer, and the script, written by Chris Nolan and his brother Jonathan, is ambitious in scope and content, and the meandering is an unavoidable consequence.  Unlike Chris Nolan's previous film, Inception, the meandering doesn't mean that the film is too long - just that the structure needed to be refined.      Case in point - the first meeting between John Blake and Bruce Wayne.  Blake implores Wayne to bring back Batman for the sake of an injured Gordon.  During this discussion, Blake goes into exposition about his past, how he first met Batman and Bruce Wayne, and hints that he knows Batman's identity.  It's a well-acted scene that doesn't move because of its necessity to relay as much information as possible to the audience.  It's a necessary scene that needs rearranging to improve the flow.     The overall thread of the idealist John Blake is wonderfully done.  Joseph Gordon-Levitt shines as the orphan turned cop who sees the world in an optimistic light in spite of the world devolving around him.  He exudes a determination and strength as Gotham's last light.  He starts out wanting to be the white knight but slowly realizes that even the whitest knight has a touch of grey.  He represents the struggle of, as Gordon put it, structures becoming shackles, and Joseph Gordon-Levitt carries that burden superbly.     Gary Oldman, as the other important part of this thread, does an amazing job as Commissioner Gordon.  Gordon started out as that idealist cop, became affected by how the world came down around him, was given a spark of hope by the arrival of Batman, and eventually became the "grey knight," the man who did was was necessary to preserve the peace, even if sacrificing the truth destroyed his marriage and faith in humanity.  He has been long recognized as one of the finest character actors of his generation, and Gary Oldman shows more and more why he deserves the accolades he has still yet to receive.     The thread involving Selina Kyle is the self-contained thread, not requiring any knowledge of the prior films, and it is the best thread of the bunch.  Anne Hathaway steals every scene she is in, vamping it up and having as much fun as possible as the expert thief who does what is necessary and is working toward getting a clean slate.  Selina Kyle is known in the comic-book world as Catwoman, but she is never called that moniker in this film, and the role and the film is all the better for it.  She's smart, sexy, strong, and soulful, and Anne Hathaway does the role justice and almost steals the film with it.     The antagonist thread of the film, all involving Bane and references to the League of Shadows, is the weakest part of the film, but it does have its moments.  Bane's introduction, an in-flight infiltration and escape, is a spectacular set piece that feels inert, not providing the ignition the film needs.  Even Bane's stock exchange takeover seems too small an explosion for the film's lift-off.  It isn't until the city takeover when the audience is pulled into the action, with Bane's menacing visage and stature commandeering the screen with purpose.  His fights with Batman are tense, brutal, and exhilarating.  His backstory, although underdeveloped, provides just enough brushstrokes to give Bane some color.     Tom Hardy, bulking up for the role, fully involves himself as Bane.  His physicality is something of a first in the series - Batman has always been the dominating physical presence, but Bane easily takes control in this film.  His speech, somewhat muffled by the mask, is hard to understand at times, and is inconsistent in the accent - for a brief moment, Hardy inadvertently performs a Sean Connery impersonation.  Nevertheless, Bane is an intimidating figure, and Tom Hardy is more than up to the task to portray Bane as the menace he is meant to be.     The protagonist thread, the one dovetailing not only the threads within the film but the entire series, is wholly fulfilling if structured oddly at the beginning of the film.  Having Bruce Wayne be a recluse, then become Batman again, then be forced to stop, and then become Batman again, at least in the way the film does it, is tonally awkward, but it gives all of the actors the moments they deserve.  The theme of this thread - what it takes for a dark knight to save himself from the darkness - is expressed expertly, and the conclusion is almost perfect.     Morgan Freeman, having a more diminished role this time around, still provides levity to these serious proceedings as Lucius Fox, and his repartee with Bruce Wayne is still electrifying.  Marion Cotillard, as potential Bruce Wayne love interest and Wayne Enterprises board member Miranda Tate, doesn't have the greatest chemistry with Bruce Wayne, but she has a tenderness that balances her calculating nature, and although Miranda Tate is not developed enough, Marion Cotillard is a captivating presence.     Michael Caine, as Batman's and Bruce Wayne's batman Alfred, is the legend he is known to be.  As the heart of the series, Alfred is the sole reason the Wayne name still gives hope, still remains viable.  His role is given several monologues, and while some of them come off as unnecessary, Caine's delivery is nothing short of extraordinary.  He is more than a servant to Bruce Wayne and Batman - he is the last father figure he has.  The final moments of the film with Alfred are the most moving of the entire series, and it is all due to subtle care that Michael Caine has taken to develop Alfred.     It takes a bold and daring actor to give a comic-book superhero some gravitas, and throughout all three films, Christian Bale has evolved as Bruce Wayne and Batman, with his work in this film being the finest in the series.  From the first film on, Bruce Wayne has been a shell of his former self, and his dedication to being Batman is as much out of a desire to do good as it is out of a need to give himself purpose.  Bale grounds and centers the film with a man who cannot let go of his anger, seeing himself as the man Gotham needs him to be while eventually realizing the man Alfred and the deceased Wayne family would have wanted him to be.  Throughout the struggles he faces, he finds solace in a woman who is looking for the clean slate he so desperately needs.  Christian Bale brings the series-long arc full circle, becoming the actor everyone will identify with Bruce Wayne and Batman above all others, and giving the film world one of the finest performances in the genre.     Cinematographer Wally Pfister paints the screen with Oscar-caliber imagery.  The opening shot of Bane's introduction in an open field is something straight out of an epic film.  The browns of the pit the bore Bane, the whites and greys of a Gotham under siege, the blacks and blues of the city at night and the Batcave, and the varying colors of Wayne Manor all leave an indelible mark.  He won an Oscar for his work on Inception, but Wally Pfister tops himself with the work done in this film.     Composer Hans Zimmer comes back alone this time, effectively using the themes developed with James Newton-Howard in the previous two films, and creating a couple of new ideas that work to varying degrees on their own but are ingrained in the film successfully.  The simple piano-based motif of Selina Kyle is beautiful, capturing the sly yet longing nature of the character, and the percussive chant of Bane's motif stays in the mind and eventually turns from an ominous chant to a motivating positive force, showing how Hans Zimmer can turn preconceived notions on their head.     With the flaws and strengths, it all falls on the shoulders of director Christopher Nolan.  His work with the actors is still surprisingly impressive, his eye for set pieces continues to astonish, and his ambition serves him well for the most part.  However, his ambition causes the series to take a turn from the realism and believeability of The Dark Knight to expected comic-book superhero fare.  Nolan tries to make grand statements about the world at large, but the statements don't cut through like they did in the previous film, especially when trying to make reference to class struggles.     However, what the film lacks in biting commentary is made up by the scope of the story of Batman and the world around him.  The thrills are more blunt than before, but therein lies the charm of this film - it may be the most fun a story as dark as this could be.  The realism is gone, but the craftsmanship is undeniable, and the story, once it gets going, is a true roller-coaster ride.  Christopher Nolan may have changed the trajectory of the series away from what it could have been, but he relishes in the destination he has created, and the joy he had creating this universe is felt in every frame.  He even perfectly caps the series arc of Bruce Wayne with a quote from A Tale of Two Cities - "It is a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to than I have ever known."      The end result is a conclusion of a series that is crying for a different set-up.  The difficulty in judging this film is in the expectations - had The Dark Knight not existed or at least been a different film, this film could have been the standard-bearer for all comic-book superhero films to follow.  However, The Dark Knight does exist, and paraphrasing the Joker in that film, it changed things forever.  The Dark Knight Rises will always pale in comparison to its predecessor because it lacks transcendence, but it stands as one of the finest films of the genre and a wholly satisfying conclusion to one of the best film trilogies, and that is all for which one could hope. Movie Rating: 9/10 A meandering and start-stop first hour gives way to a thrilling, emotional, and fun conclusion. Film Rating: 8/10 It pales next to The Dark Knight, and its commentary is toothless, but how it concludes the main series arc is excellent. Comic-Book Superhero Film Rating: 9/10 It may not be the deepest, but it is one of the best, and it may be the definition of "serious fun." Batman Film Rating: 8.5/10 On par with Batman Begins, but following The Dark Knight means that it could have been more.

A Focus on the Basics

A new year has begun.  It is a time for reflection, a time for nostalgia, and a time for motivation.

2013 was the craziest year of my life so far.  It was an emotional and visceral roller-coaster from which I learned a lot about myself, about what I want and need.  As I look back, I realize the one thing that I need to start doing in my life if I want to succeed as a professional, as a husband, and as me --- focus on the basics.

In 2012, I was scared that I was stagnating professionally, worried that I was going to be stuck in autopilot and become the unambitious, listless worker everyone fears to be for the rest of his or her life.  I went to graduate school to gain a deeper understanding of my engineering interests, and it was frittering away.  It affected my personal life as well --- I became less productive at home and started to believe that I wasn't living up to the husband I wanted to be.  By the end of 2012, I took a risk and left my job for another with the promise of a real challenge.  There was a lot of thought and deliberation for that decision, and I can honestly say it was a great decision.

However, my stagnation concerns returned, and inward crept the fears again.  My job took more and more of my time, and I felt like I was neglecting my personal life.  I wrote film critiques and played guitar less and less, I struggled keeping in touch with friends and family, and I rarely stopped to look and appreciate where my life had taken me.  My fitness level dropped like a stone in water, and every time I tried to restart working out, something would come up that would take me out of it.

On the professional side, it wasn't a fear that I was wasting my knowledge away, but a fear that I would never be an equal to my co-workers and respected by my superiors.  For every step forward that I took, I felt that there was something that would happen that would knock me two steps backward.  Every time that happened, I looked at myself and wondered whether I should have become an engineer.  I thought I was growing at a snail's pace while everyone else was significantly further along.  The challenge was winning. 

As 2014 begins, I realize that perceived lack of growth is just that --- perceived.  I have grown significantly throughout 2013, and thankfully only a small percentage of that is my weight.  I still have a long way to go, but the hindrance is me.  I'm so focused on gaining advanced knowledge and skills that I've neglected basic principles.  I want to play hard guitar songs without practicing my scales and learning my modes.  I want to be five years down the road personally and professionally so badly that I forget to learn how to live and work now.

So, starting in 2014, I will strive harder to find the work-life balance.  I will improve my fitness to be as good as, if not better than, it was my first year of marriage.  I will focus on learning and memorizing the engineering basics so that I have a foundation of knowledge that won't be on mental sand.  I will learn to understand that I will fail several times before I succeed.  I will play my scales and modes so that my fingers stay nimble enough for playing along with my songs.  I will find a little bit of time to read leisurely, regardless of how long it takes me to finish a book.  I will write more film critiques and complete the cycle of Star Wars critiques I began a couple of years ago.  I will stop and take stock in the life that I have so that I have a solid foundation for the life I will have.  For all who read this, please hold me accountable.  I know I can't do this alone, but I know that I can do this.

My Workout For Saturday January 04

I earned 173 points for my workout on Fitocracy!

Running (treadmill) +88 pts

0:20:00 || 1.4 mi || 1 % (+88 pts)

Chin-Up +2 pts

6 reps || assisted || 130 lb (+2 pts)

Reverse Crunch +44 pts

13 reps (+16 pts)

11 reps (+14 pts)

11 reps (+14 pts)

Plank +17 pts

30 sec (+10 pts)

20 sec (+7 pts)

Side Plank Lifts +20 pts

5 reps (+10 pts)

5 reps (+10 pts)

Stretching +2 pts

0:10:00 (+2 pts)

Think you can beat me, or want to comment?

Fitocracy is the social fitness community that has helped hundreds of thousands level up their fitness. Start your fitness transformation today!

Now available for free on both iPhone and Android!