me: it’s awkward when men approach me because i don’t know how to turn them down without putting myself at risk
some idiot: um just tell them you’re gay sweaty
meanwhile,straight men:
“Suspects can not be sentenced for a general call to jihad, for spreading propaganda for terrorist organizations, preaching their causes or glorifying their actions, a German federal court rules.”
Source
“A 62-year-old woman was sentenced to a fine of 1,350 euro for liking a Facebook post about refugees. One of the comments read; “How do you like your refugees?” with the answer being “In the distance.”
Her Facebook was banned and her house was raided by police.
The judge deemed it ‘incitement’ [to violence/hate], and ‘not amusing’.
Source, second source.
Dose anyone ells think of TF2 when they look at this?
Wonder Woman: The Art of War Statue by Robert Valley
Available Fall 2015
When someone tells me that the White men stole this land, and that we are a Nation of Immigrants.
Bayzle Morgan, 24, is accused of stealing a man’s motorcycle at gunpoint in Las Vegas, Nevada.
A panel of potential jurors allegedly said they wouldn’t be able to treat Morgan’s case fairly because of the markings, prompting a district judge to require them to be covered.
Morgan showed up in court on Monday covered in concealer – and when his attorney said the make-up had started wearing off, the judge agreed to delay jury selection.
Morgan is to remove the make-up after each day in court before he returns to the Clark County Detention Center.Potential jurors didn’t appear to see Morgan’s tattoos underneath the concealer on Monday, but one of his attorneys, Dan Bunin, said in the early afternoon that two of them had started showing up.
One was the ‘Baby Nazi’ inscription on Morgan’s neck and the other was a teardrop tattoo below his right eye.
Teardrop tattoos can have several meanings. Some signal that the wearer has killed someone, has been in prison, or was part of a gang.
District Judge Richard Scotti allowed a cosmetologist to touch up Morgan’s makeup, delaying jury selection by 30 minutes Monday.
The make-up artist recommended he wear a brown shirt instead of a white or black white for future court dates.
So I guess all we need to do is have someone cover us in white face and there’s a chance we will get a fair trial or lenient sentence in court.
I guess it would be a lot easier to just get a police officer Halloween costume.
…what about people that are unattractive? What if they get convicted at higher rates? What about people with constant resting bitch face? What about diminutive people? What about people with non-nazi tattoos which may sway the jury? Finally, and most relevant, what about black people, who there is a proven bias against that is widespread and subconscious? If we’re covering tattoos, then we MUST go whole hog and do blind trials otherwise not everyone is being treated equally under the law (being afforded the same ability to have a bias-less trial) and therefore violating their 6th amendment constitutional right to “an impartial jury of the state”. So, I hope some prominent black lawyer is about to file a lawsuit against the state.
For British citizens only.
Rape laws in the UK are sexist. As defined by the Sexual Offences Act 2003:
Section 1 makes it an offence for a person (A) intentionally to penetrate with his penis the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) without that person’s consent if A does not reasonably believe that B consents. Subsection (2) provides that whether a belief in consent is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents. This and the offence in section 5 are the only offences that can only be committed by a male, because they relate to penile penetration. Subsection (3) provides that sections 75 and 76 apply to this offence. Sections 75 and 76 deal with evidential and conclusive presumptions about consent.
The Crown Prosecution Service describes rape as:
The elements of rape are:
(A) intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis; (B) does not consent to the penetration, and (A) does not reasonably believe that (B) consents
Penetration of the mouth is included.
This petition seeks to change this sexist and outdated definition of rape.
It closes on the 22nd of August 2017, so please sign it if you can, or share it so British followers can sign it!
130 posts