kiddie au for fun
I'm going to be fully honest, I hate the use of problematic as a coined term for fictional ships. I feel like problematic has just become one of those terms tossed around at anything and everything and often used as a gotcha net.
"I don't care about your ships as long as they're not problematic."
Okay. Are we talking about incest or just a ship where they have clashing political opinions?
Am I not allowed to ship the sentient wolf creature with the twink or am I not allowed to ship the two middle aged store clerks who have different views on wanting children?
What if one half of my canon ship gets de-aged to eighteen? Is it suddenly problematic to ship them for as long as that character remains de-aged?
What kind of age brackets are we defining as problematic these days? What are the cut-off points for when its not problematic for two people to fall in love? What if one person has a birthday before the other one and for a few months they're not part of that acceptable bracket anymore?
Problematic is just being used as a one-word way to shut people down and force them to comply with your own expectations and boundaries. Problematic is thrown around as a way to box people into behaving and existing in ways that make you comfortable.
"I don't like the way that you exist so I'm going to brand you as this negative word that forces you to change to suit my preferences or be shunned by society."
Problematic means to constitute as or to present a problem. It is not the shiny new term for 'if you ship this thing you're a terrible person.'
The Ultra-war was a pretty big war between the realities. While the war was happening, different kinds of creatures started appearing as byproducts of the war. They were described as parasitic creatures a.k.a parasites.
Now, what I'm gonna talk about is what I think caused the war to start in the first place.
Do you remember when Fran entered Ithersta and turned into a tree because her human body was destroyed? Yeah, it's pretty hard to forget about that... But at that part of the game, so much more happens than that. Because later on when you get carried to Ziar (the tree king, you have to remember him, otherwise you're not a real fran bow fan) he tells you this: "You can't leave now, it would be too dangerous for us".
But why is it? And why now? After this, Fran gets taken by Palontras (that big fluffy flying axolotl, you HAVE to know him, really) he tells you that: "When you traveled to Ithersta, you opened a door between your reality and ours. And with this door opened, unexpected creatures can also enter our reality! ...And if that happens, the balance will be tainted!"
So basically, what he's telling us is that when Fran fell from the bridge, she entered Ithersta by opening a door between the third reality and Ithersta but after she entered the door remained open and because of that, every kind of monsters can enter Ithersta from the third reality whom will obviously cause troubles. Which we even see through out the game! As Palontras fought them and got seriously injured.
Out of Ithersta. In the 4th chapter's second part, after Fran finally arrived to her aunt's house and got Mr. Midnight to get in the window and open the door for her because her aunt was not home, she gets violently pulled into the car by Dr. Deern (Welp, that was a pretty dick move Marcel. Don't you know how to treat a little lady?!) forced to leave her kitty inside the house. After they drive away, even if only for a mere second, but you can see a bunch of Kamalas and Valokas standing next to each other way too close for comfort. That is the beginning of the war, which we had no idea that it was happening until Little Misfortune came out.
Also there was a snail character in Ithersta (who's name I do not know) who were very strongly hinting to the war.
And that's it! I hope I helped you understand a little bit more about Fran Bow. I'll do more theories about Fran Bow/Little Misfortune very soon :)
Obsessed with these shots of hisoka sitting by himself bcuz like yeah no one likes him
a littly contradictory, aren’t we, illu?
i can’t seem to figure out how to reblog with an image, but it’s a reference to this
uh…look what i did when i found it hard to listen to my prof without falling asleep~ she later asked me what i’d been drawing… i couldn’t really tell her about my favourite killer clown and his assassin friend, could i.
Keep reading
An explanation of the burden of proof fallacy.
This is how it should be when debating.
For those who say...
"Fiction effects reality on a 1:1 scale."
"Consuming ____ leads to ____."
"If you consume/like ____, you're a pedophile."
...it is YOUR responsibility to prove that claim.
Fandom Problem #4580:
Even if you got your wish, and every website ever stopped allowing "problematic" content or ships, good luck with arguing until the end of goddamn time about just where the lines should be drawn. Because no matter how "wholesome" you think your stuff is, SOMEONE will end up having a problem with it. I don't care how progressive you think you are, you played directly into the hands of all these right-wing evangelicals with their mass book bannings to "protect the kids" because you thought you were grown enough to go online but not grown enough to learn to just not fucking look at things you don't like. You get mad when people say you're conservatives in a gay hat but that's really what you are. Own it and accept the reality you're trying to help create.
A younger version of Clara and Mia. A photo taken after they were sewed together. I couldn’t decide if it was better with Clara having tears or not so I put here both versions. Hope you like it!
T H E
S P 0 0 K S