Looks Like I’m Getting A New Wallpaper

My favorite YouTube video as of now (I know this doesn’t seem like it’s related to space - but it has a nice discussion about black holes and hawking radiation, which is I love it so much)

Remember kids: be cautious of bouncy castles!

WANT MORE? GET YOUR HEAD STUCK IN THE STARS AT MY BLOG!

More nebulae!!!

WANT MORE? GET YOUR HEAD STUCK IN THE STARS AT MY BLOG!

M27: Not a Comet : While hunting for comets in the skies above 18th century France, astronomer Charles Messier diligently kept a list of the things he encountered that were definitely not comets. This is number 27 on his now famous not-a-comet list. In fact, 21st century astronomers would identify it as a planetary nebula, but it’s not a planet either, even though it may appear round and planet-like in a small telescope. Messier 27 (M27) is an excellent example of a gaseous emission nebula created as a sun-like star runs out of nuclear fuel in its core. The nebula forms as the star’s outer layers are expelled into space, with a visible glow generated by atoms excited by the dying star’s intense but invisible ultraviolet light. Known by the popular name of the Dumbbell Nebula, the beautifully symmetric interstellar gas cloud is over 2.5 light-years across and about 1,200 light-years away in the constellation Vulpecula. This impressive color composite highlights details within the well-studied central region and fainter, seldom imaged features in the nebula’s outer halo. It incorporates broad and narrowband images recorded using filters sensitive to emission from hydrogen and oxygen atoms. via NASA

I felt that

I mean they are pretty connected, so even if you choose one you’ll probably have to deal with the other.

WANT MORE? GET YOUR HEAD STUCK IN THE STARS AT MY BLOG!

Can I have both?

Honestly I don’t really understand why they didn’t call the APOLLO missions the ARTEMIS missions! Artemis is the greek goddess of the moon, not Apollo xD

Dat rocket does look cool though. I prefer posting about astrophysics, but I’m having a lazy day and rockets are easy to find and cool to look at. Apologies for anyone expecting another post on stars or memes.

WANT MORE? GET YOUR HEAD STUCK IN THE STARS AT MY BLOG!

NASA Attaches First of 4 RS-25 Engines to Artemis I Rocket Stage : Engineers and technicians at NASA’s Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans have structurally mated the first of four RS-25 engines to the core stage for NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket that will help power the first Artemis mission to the Moon. (via NASA)

I mean, the song really isn’t accurate.

Also that’s a bit unfair. I’m pretty super that’s a Red Super Giant. Not all stars are that huge xD (even though I’d wouldn’t describe any star as “little”)

WANT MORE? GET YOUR HEAD STUCK IN THE STARS AT MY BLOG!

Little star : am I a joke to you?

Aw heck yeah let’s go

WANT MORE? GET YOUR HEAD STUCK IN THE STARS AT MY BLOG!

List of extrasolar candidates for liquid water

The following list contains candidates from the list of confirmed objects that meet the following criteria:

Confirmed object orbiting within a circumstellar habitable zone of Earth mass or greater (because smaller objects may not have the gravitational means to retain water) but not a star

Has been studied for more than a year

Confirmed surface with strong evidence for it being either solid or liquid

Water vapour detected in its atmosphere

Gravitational, radio or differentation models that predict a wet stratum

55 Cancri f

With a mass half that of Saturn, 55 Cancri f is likely to be a gas giant with no solid surface. It orbits in the so-called “habitable zone,” which means that liquid water could exist on the surface of a possible moon. ]

Proxima Centauri b

Proxima Centauri b is an exoplanet orbiting in the habitable zone of the red dwarfstar Proxima Centauri, which is the closest star to the Sun and part of a triple star system. It is located about 4.2 light-years from Earth in the constellation of Centaurus, making it the closest known exoplanet to the Solar System.

Gliese 581c

Gliese 581c gained interest from astronomers because it was reported to be the first potentially Earth-like planet in the habitable zone of its star, with a temperature right for liquid water on its surface, and by extension, potentially capable of supporting extremophile forms of Earth-like life.

Gliese 667 Cc

Gliese 667 Cc is an exoplanet orbiting within the habitable zone of the red dwarf star Gliese 667 C, which is a member of the Gliese 667 triple star system, approximately 23.62 light-years away in the constellation of Scorpius.

Gliese 1214 b

Gliese 1214 b is an exoplanet that orbits the star Gliese 1214, and was discovered in December 2009. Its parent star is 48 light-years from the Sun, in the constellation Ophiuchus. As of 2017, GJ 1214 b is the most likely known candidate for being an ocean planet. For that reason, scientists have nicknamed the planet “the waterworld”.

HD 85512 b

HD 85512 b is an exoplanet orbiting HD 85512, a K-type main-sequence star approximately 36 light-years from Earth in the constellation of Vela.

Due to its mass of at least 3.6 times the mass of Earth, HD 85512 b is classified as a rocky Earth-size exoplanet (<5M⊕) and is one of the smallest exoplanets discovered to be just outside the inner edge of the habitable zone.

MOA-2007-BLG-192Lb

MOA-2007-BLG-192Lb, occasionally shortened to MOA-192 b, is an extrasolar planet approximately 3,000 light-years away in the constellation of Sagittarius. The planet was discovered orbiting the brown dwarf or low-mass star MOA-2007-BLG-192L. At a mass of approximately 3.3 times Earth, it is one of the lowest-mass extrasolar planets at the time of discovery. It was found when it caused a gravitational microlensing event on May 24, 2007, which was detected as part of the MOA-II microlensing survey at the Mount John University Observatory in New Zealand.

Kepler-22b

Kepler-22b, also known by its Kepler object of interest designation KOI-087.01, is an extrasolar planet orbiting within the habitable zone of the Sun-like star Kepler-22. It is located about 587 light-years (180 pc) from Earth in the constellation of Cygnus. source

THE LIFE OF A STAR: A STAR IS BORN

All you need to make a star is dust, gravity, and time.

        Stars form from nebulae's molecular clouds - which are "clumpy, with regions containing a wide range of densities—from a few tens of molecules (mostly hydrogen) per cubic centimetre to more than one million." Stars are only made in the densest regions - cloud cores - and larger cloud cores create more massive stars. Stars also form in associations in these cores. Cores with higher percentages of mass used only for star formation will have more stars bound together, while lower percentages will have stars drifting apart. 

        These cloud cores rotate very slowly and its mass is highly concentrated in its center - while also spinning and flattening into a disk (Britannica: Star Formation). This concentration is caused by gravity. As the mass of the clump increases - it is very cold and close to absolute zero, which increases density and causes atoms to bind together into molecules such as CO and H2 - it's gravity increases and at a certain point, it will collapse under it (Uoregon). The pressure, spinning, and compressing create kinetic energy which continues to heat the gas and increase density.

        Finally, there's the last ingredient: time. The process of these molecular clouds clumping, spinning, concentrating, and collapsing takes quite a while. From start (the cloud core-forming) to finish (the birth of a main-sequence star) - the average time is at about a cool 10 million years (yikes). Of course, this differs with density and mass, but this is the time for a typical solar-type star (StackExchange).

        The next stage in a star's life - after the nebulae - is a protostar.

        After one clump separates from the cloud core, it develops its own identity and gravity, and loose gas falls into the center. This releases more kinetic energy and heats the gas, as well as the pressure. This clump will collapse under gravity, grow in density in the center. and trap infrared light inside (causing it to become opaque) (Uoregon).

        A protostar looks like a normal star - emitting light - but it's just a baby star. Protostars' cores are not hot enough to undergo nuclear fusion and the light they emit (instead of coming from the release of photons after the fusion of atoms) comes from the heat of the protostar as it contracts under gravity. By the time this is formed, the spinning and gravity have flattened the dust and gas into a protostellar disk. The rotation also generates a magnetic field - which generates a protostellar wind - and sometimes even streams or jets of gas into space (LCO).    

        This protostar, which is not much bigger than Jupiter, continues to grow by taking in more dust and gas. The light emitted absorbs dust and is remitted over and over again, resulting in a shift to longer wavelengths and causing the protostar to emit infrared light. The growth of the star is halted as jets of material stream out from the poles - the cause of this has been unidentified, although theories suggest that strong magnetic fields and rotation "act as whirling rotary blades to fling out the nearby gas." (Britannica: Star Formation)

        The "infall" of stars stops by pressure, and the protostar becomes more stable. Eventually, the temperature grows so hot (a few million kelvins) that thermonuclear fusion begins - usually in the form of deuterium (a heavier form of hydrogen), lithium, beryllium, and boron - which radiates light and energy. This starts the pre-main-sequence star phase - also called T Tauri stars - which includes lots of surface activity in the form of flares, stellar winds, opaque circumstellar disks, and stellar jets. In this phase, the star begins to contract - it can lose almost 50% of its mass - and the more massive the star, the shorter the T Tauri phase (Uoregon).

        Eventually, when the star's core becomes hot enough (in some cases, we'll touch on this later), it will begin to fuse hydrogen. This will produce "an outward pressure that balances with the inward pressure caused by gravity, stabilizing the star." (Space.com)

        This will either create an average-sized star or a massive star.

        Nuclear fusion marks the beginning of the main sequence star. A star is born.

        But it isn't always.

        Now that we've discussed the transition from nebulae to main-sequence star, we'll be talking about what happens when hydrogen fusion doesn't occur. Those are called Brown Dwarfs.

        Brown Dwarfs are those stars that form much too small - less than 0.08 the sun's mass - and as a result, they cannot undergo hydrogen fusion (Space.com).

        Brown Dwarfs, are, bigger than planets. They are roughly between the size of Jupiter and our sun. Like protostars, brown dwarfs start by fusing deuterium, and their cores contract and increase in heat as they do so. Brown Dwarfs, however, cannot contract to the size required to heat the core enough to fuse hydrogen. Their cores are dense enough to hold themselves up with pressure. They are much colder compared to main-sequence stars, ranging from 2,800 K to 300 K (the sun is 5,800 K). They are called "Brown Dwarfs" because objects below 2,200 often cold too much and develop minerals in their atmosphere, turning a brown-red color (Britannica: Brown Dwarf).

        Once Brown Dwarfs have fused all of their deuterium, they glow infrared, and the force of gravity overcomes internal pressure (the internal force of nuclear fusion used to keep it stable) as it slowly collapses. They eventually cool down and become dark balls of gas - black dwarfs (NRAO).

        Now that we've covered how stars form - and what happens in certain cases where they are not - we'll be moving to the actual life of a star. Before we talk about the end of a star's life (arguably - my favorite part) we need to discuss main-sequence, cycles, mass, heat, pressure, structure, and more. This is to understand how a star died the way it did.

        Because - when it comes to the menu of star death - stars have a few options to choose from.

First -  Chapter 1: An Introduction

Previous -  Chapter 3: Star Nurseries

Next -  Chapter 5: A Day in the Life

WANT MORE? GET YOUR HEAD STUCK IN THE STARS AT MY BLOG!

Pass the happy! 🌌✨ When you receive this, list 5 things that make you happy and send this to 10 of the last people in your notifications!

1. Being reminded to think of happy things xD

2. Space (literally anything, you guys can tell how obsessed I am)

3. Writing Sci-Fi stories

4. Wearing a sweater on a cold day

5. Having lemon cookies to go with my coffee

Remember to all: especially in times like these, it’s nice to take a minute and think about the things that make you happy. They don’t have to be super obvious and sappy, like your family or your pet dog, they can be the little things that brighten your day. Like stars, and lemon cookies. Think about happy little things.

Can I go to Lake Thetis? Damn.

Florida’s got nothing on this place, I’m sorry. 

WANT MORE? GET YOUR HEAD STUCK IN THE STARS AT MY BLOG!

Milky Way + Stromatolites - Lake Thetis, Western Australia

Nikon d5500 - 35mm - 9 x 13s - ISO 3200 - f/2.2

The search for another Earth is super cool even if it might never end lol

But like, Aliens.

WANT MORE? GET YOUR HEAD STUCK IN THE STARS AT MY BLOG!

Are We Alone? How NASA Is Trying to Answer This Question.

One of the greatest mysteries that life on Earth holds is, “Are we alone?”

At NASA, we are working hard to answer this question. We’re scouring the universe, hunting down planets that could potentially support life. Thanks to ground-based and space-based telescopes, including Kepler and TESS, we’ve found more than 4,000 planets outside our solar system, which are called exoplanets. Our search for new planets is ongoing — but we’re also trying to identify which of the 4,000 already discovered could be habitable.

Unfortunately, we can’t see any of these planets up close. The closest exoplanet to our solar system orbits the closest star to Earth, Proxima Centauri, which is just over 4 light years away. With today’s technology, it would take a spacecraft 75,000 years to reach this planet, known as Proxima Centauri b.

How do we investigate a planet that we can’t see in detail and can’t get to? How do we figure out if it could support life?

This is where computer models come into play. First we take the information that we DO know about a far-off planet: its size, mass and distance from its star. Scientists can infer these things by watching the light from a star dip as a planet crosses in front of it, or by measuring the gravitational tugging on a star as a planet circles it.

We put these scant physical details into equations that comprise up to a million lines of computer code. The code instructs our Discover supercomputer to use our rules of nature to simulate global climate systems. Discover is made of thousands of computers packed in racks the size of vending machines that hum in a deafening chorus of data crunching. Day and night, they spit out 7 quadrillion calculations per second — and from those calculations, we paint a picture of an alien world.

While modeling work can’t tell us if any exoplanet is habitable or not, it can tell us whether a planet is in the range of candidates to follow up with more intensive observations. 

One major goal of simulating climates is to identify the most promising planets to turn to with future technology, like the James Webb Space Telescope, so that scientists can use limited and expensive telescope time most efficiently.

Additionally, these simulations are helping scientists create a catalog of potential chemical signatures that they might detect in the atmospheres of distant worlds. Having such a database to draw from will help them quickly determine the type of planet they’re looking at and decide whether to keep observing or turn their telescopes elsewhere.

Learn more about exoplanet exploration, here. 

Make sure to follow us on Tumblr for your regular dose of space: http://nasa.tumblr.com.